« End of consumerism | Main | How close are we to democratic nirvana? »

05 October 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8342071e053ef0105353d1f66970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The sweatshop debate:

Comments

Chris Billett

It's an interesting argument, and one that I've sat on both sides of. A couple of years ago I wore only fairtrade and organic clothes then, getting a bit cynical (and a bit broke, and a bit sick of watching upper-middle-class folk being the only ones that could afford the increasingly expensive clothes that cost 60p more to make) I kind of stopped... I guess my reasons were more selfish than yours... must read your original article later.

Edd P

Interesting video.
I think you got your points accross very well Tom, you definatly havnt come accross as a pro-exploitation hypercapitalist.

Bip Mistry

Hi Tom

I disagree with your 'Global trade is the best way for a country to develop economically'... i think that global trade created the sweatshops in the first place, and continues to create the worst of them now. you don't have to visit many sweatshops to realise that they shouldn't exist. you should look into 'cottage industries' too, if such a phenomenon still exists! a dollar a day didn't do anybody a favour, look at india, tanzania etc... the sweatshop worker will always be the bottom rung on the ladder. i worked in a 'sweatshop' in bradford in the 1980's, steam ironing cardigans at 2 pence per item.
Bip

Tom Nixon

Hi Bip, thanks for commenting.

Personally I don't put cottage industries in developed countries in the same basket as sweatshops in poorer countries. They contribute nothing to society and I don't think Britain had any excuses for not having better labour standards and a minimum wage far earlier.

I guess the question is that if globalisation created the sweatshops, was working life in poor countries better before? And if not, without global trade, how would life get better? Countries like the UK and US started out on a path to prosperity through sweatshops hundreds of years ago. They are a stepping stone.

I'm not saying that sweatshops are desirable, or that we should tolerate exploitation. That's why we need to put pressure on countries and corporations to continually improve standards.

bonnie

So I didn't get to watch the video, but I have read a lot of pro sweatshop arguements. And one that I think is sad, is that children when they no longer can work in sweatshops due to laws and what not, they have to turn to other ways that are lower in standards, such as prositution. And to me, that is like the worst for a child. And also I read another thing about a book, the lady liberated children from a sweatshop and they were throwing bottles at her because they now would go hungry and were homeless. Yeah sweatshops aren't good, but are they better then the alternitives? And that really isn't up to us, it's up to those that are working there.

Louis Vuitton Outlet

This will reduce and equalize mold temperatures.

online casino

Très belle sujets Je suis tellement heureux parce que finalement j'ai trouvé une belle sujets ...

ClubPenguinCheats

I think that global trade created the sweatshops in the first place, and continues to create the worst of them now.

swarovski crystal uk

I find I don't usually have sympathy cards on hand, and I supposed it's because I don't ever want to have to use them. But, they are necessary, so I figure now's a good time to stock up! (Thanks Lisa!) Countries like the UK and US started out on a path to prosperity through sweatshops hundreds of years ago. They are a stepping stone.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Hello

  • I'm Tom, a co-founder and director at Nixon McInnes - the social media agency in Brighton.

What am I doing?

    follow me on Twitter