I've heard some pretty bad stories about how companies award performance-related bonuses to their employees. This ranges from 'number plucked out of the air' by a manager, to putting all members of a department in some kind of one-dimensional ranking and awarding bonuses on a downwards sliding scale according to where you you have been placed.
We wanted to do something a bit different at our company and we have come up with the idea of setting a list of performance criteria (e.g. completing objectives that were set for you; project performance; soliciting and acting on personal development feedback etc) but instead of the manager making the judgment call, the employee rates their own performance for each area as a percentage, and then they are awarded that percentage of the maximum available bonus.
The manager has power to increase the percentage if they feel the employee has been too harsh on themself, but not to decrease it, thus leaving it to the integrity of the person.
To make a system like this work you have to have a very transparent culture. We have open-booking accounting so salaries and bonuses are public knowledge. This makes the system self-policing. Who would want to be seen by their co-workers as taking a bigger bonus than they deserve?
[Credit to Phil Herborn for developing this idea]
Interesting. A step on the way to employees setting their own salaries perhaps? If pay was decided by similar clear and open criteria then it could be seen to be fair. Percieved unfairness in pay relative to colleagues is a stong demotivator, no matter what the absolute level is.
Posted by: Alex Farran | 13 June 2007 at 11:55 AM
The manager has power to increase the percentage if they feel the employee has been too harsh on themself, but not to decrease it, thus leaving it to the integrity of the person.
Posted by: discount cycling clothing | 13 May 2011 at 06:20 AM
Your blog post seems like a storyline extracted from a novel.
Posted by: Oakley Sunglasses Cheap | 05 July 2011 at 03:02 AM
pepcvupnojypo, Cheap Used Cars, PiMfXGJ, [url=http://www.localusedcars.co.uk/]Cheap Used Cars[/url], YfQZMWP, http://www.localusedcars.co.uk/ Cheap Used Cars, CoFEqKw, Loans For People With Bad Credit, TuVhNrH, [url=http://www.badcreditloans247.info/]Loans For People With Bad Credit[/url], KLcPCfZ, http://www.badcreditloans247.info/ Loans For People With Bad Credit, aSjWywJ, penny auction reviews , uYgTuYq, [url=http://bouncybidsspecialoffer.com/]bouncy bids reviews[/url], lbMbsdL, http://bouncybidsspecialoffer.com/ penny auctions, ELNmBQo, wen hair care, UGvWccD, [url=http://wenhaircarespecialoffer.net/]hair restoration[/url], JjFkDoE, http://wenhaircarespecialoffer.net/ wen hair care, OltRwiw, p90x diet, EmdmJUq, [url=http://p90x-today.net/]p90x diet[/url], fadUfey, http://p90x-today.net/ p90x diet, OPXznli, eye cream, ycBvIBJ, [url=http://purasilktoday.com/]dark circles under eyes[/url], oApvmTe, http://purasilktoday.com/ anti aging, CjwOhKc.
Posted by: Cheap Used Cars | 25 October 2011 at 08:07 AM
Very happy to see your article, I very much to like and agree with your point of view.
Posted by: aaron-kampman-jersey | 04 November 2011 at 01:25 AM
Thanks for this brilliant article. I am delighted after reading this. Thank you!
Posted by: bercrombie & fitch outlet | 05 November 2011 at 02:04 AM
This looks delicious. I'm going to have to file this one away for myself!
Posted by: moncler usa | 01 December 2011 at 03:14 AM
btTKQLSD, http://www.monclerjacketssale.info/ - moncler ,kEosFxIn, moncler ,ThHrXiLU, http://www.monclerjacketssales.info/ moncler , jNFIeWpw
Posted by: moncler | 13 December 2011 at 09:18 AM
ognujwwce uggs on sale itrgchhtz http://canadagoosecoats.yolasite.com/uggs-for-sale.php
Posted by: ReeFarcance | 25 December 2011 at 09:15 AM
hW uggs outlet online qC http://cheapuggbootsonline122.webnode.com/ugg-factory-outlet/
Posted by: Dootalley | 25 December 2011 at 09:20 AM